Genuine Gifts

24 08 2006

Filed under: Conservative, Liberal, Katrina

Marvin Olasky’s weekly column takes a look at the magnitude and generosity of conservative Christians to people in need, especially, hurricane Katrina victims.

With the Hurricane Katrina anniversary coming up late this month, it’s worth noting that relief work by Christian groups over the past year not only saved lives but had a public-relations effect.

The Virginian-Pilot rarely has anything good to say about its sometimes-embarrassing Virginia Beach neighbor, Pat Robertson, but it praised the work of Robertson’s poverty-fighting organization: “In a forgotten corner of obliterated eastern New Orleans, where desperate locals have been without medical facilities for nearly a year, Operation Blessing has stepped in to fill the void. It has spent some $1 million on a free medical and dental clinic that serves almost 100 patients each day.”

My good friend, Pete, will probably dispute this anyway 🙂

Maybe Christians will finally get some recognition for (in part) living up to the name of Christ. In a book coming out in December, Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks shows that religious people (mostly Christians) “of all political persuasions are 40 percent more likely to donate to charities each year than secular people, and more than twice as likely to volunteer.

Brooks concludes, “So who is more compassionate: the religious right, or the secular left? The answer appears to be the former. The reason for this, however, revolves around religion, not political ideology. The relatively large religious right and fairly small religious left are both far more compassionate than secularists from either political side. The most uncompassionate group of all—in attitudes and behaviors—is a subset of conservatives who are also secularists. Inordinate media attention to this group may help explain why conservatives are often accused of being uncompassionate.”

Those data go along with what I’ve observed over the years: Conservative forces include both compassionate Bible-followers and compassion-despising Social Darwinists. Americans who make up the religious left often have a poor understanding of economics and often underestimate the ravages of sin, but they also tend to display personal commitment and compassion.

Some Christians may even be altruistic out of selfishness: If I give, God will give me more. God does bless those who obey Him, but those who assume the blessings are material may be surprised. Still, even mixed motives in giving should not keep us from being charitable.

I like what Miroslav Volf said in his book, Free of Charge, about a metaphor used by Reformation theologians involving water and ink: “Water is the good creation, ink is sin, and the sinner is a glass of water with a few drops of ink. All the water in the glass is tainted, but it’s still mostly water, not ink. Analogously, all our good deeds are marred by sin, but they are still mostly good deeds, not crimes masquerading as merits.”

Volf concludes, “Now apply this to gifts. We give gifts. None of them pure. Yet with all their impurities, many of them are still genuine gifts, not just hidden ways of loving ourselves.” We need to keep this in mind: Imperfect, but still heartfelt. And even liberal reporters sometimes come to respect that.




Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: