If Jihadists could Vote . . . it would be Democrat

3 11 2006

Filed under: War on Terror, Election, Politics

If Jihadists could Vote . . . it would be Democrat. World Net Daily sat down with several key terrorist leader in an exclusive interview. The reason why is obvious: Democrats are softer.

Everybody has an opinion about next Tuesday’s midterm congressional election in the U.S. – including senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND who say they hope Americans sweep the Democrats into power because of the party’s position on withdrawing from Iraq, a move, as they see it, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.

The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are “tired.”

They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

They said a withdrawal would also embolden their own terror groups to enhance “resistance” against Israel.

“Of course Americans should vote Democrat,” Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity, told WND.

For citizens that don’t enjoy voting because they view it as always having to “choose between the lessor of two evils”, the above statements by Jihadists should resonate very loud in your heart and mind. Vote Republican to prevent a Democrat majority is an ardent choice, otherwise we may lose our way of life as we know it and the potential for change along with it.

Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas’ military wing in the Gaza Strip, said the policy of withdrawal “proves the strategy of the resistance is the right strategy against the occupation.”

“We warned the Americans that this will be their end in Iraq,” said Abu Abdullah, considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas’ Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas’ declared “resistance” department. “They did not succeed in stealing Iraq’s oil, at least not at a level that covers their huge expenses. They did not bring stability. Their agents in the [Iraqi] regime seem to have no chance to survive if the Americans withdraw.”

Abu Ayman, an Islamic Jihad leader in Jenin, said he is “emboldened” by those in America who compare the war in Iraq to Vietnam.

The debate became especially poignant following remarks by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the 2004 presidential candidate who voted in support of the war in Iraq. Earlier this week he intimated American troops are uneducated, and it is the uneducated who “get stuck in Iraq.”

In a recent interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, stated, “The jihadists (are) in Iraq. But that doesn’t mean we stay there. They’ll stay there as long as we’re there.”

WND read Pelosi’s remarks to the terror leaders, who unanimously rejected her contention an American withdrawal would end the insurgency.

Islamic Jihad’s Saadi, laughing, stated, “There is no chance that the resistance will stop.”

He said an American withdrawal from Iraq would “prove the resistance is the most important tool and that this tool works. The victory of the Iraqi revolution will mark an important step in the history of the region and in the attitude regarding the United States.”

Jihad Jaara said an American withdrawal would “mark the beginning of the collapse of this tyrant empire (America).

“Therefore, a victory in Iraq would be a greater defeat for America than in Vietnam.”

They are more commited to winning. They are more unified. And they understand what they want and why.

Resistance: the most important tool. And American citizens control to what extent their tool is used. Do we allow them to employ their tool or hold it for another day when they are even weaker? I’d hope for the latter.

In the last several weeks, I have heard several liberals on talk radio stations answer a disturbing question in an alarming way. The question is this:

“If you could end the War on Terror, would you sacrifice your freedom to do so?”

It’s a simple question yet most liberals could not answer with a simple Yes or No. Of course not. They never can. But many liberls basically said Yes, they would sacrifice their freedom if it would end the War on Terror.

What happened to “Give me liberty or give me death!” thinking? Or Braveheart’s “They may take our lives, but they’ll never take our freedom!” inspiration? If I can’t live free, I’d rather not live at all. I’m with Pat and Will! 🙂

If resistance is their most important tool, ours is steadfastness. Stay the course, defend freedom.

Others: Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, Michelle Malkin (response), Wizbang, Wizbang, Wizbang, Stop The ACLU, Captain’s Quarters, Blue Star Chronicles

Open Trackback: Stop The ACLU, Woman Honor Thyself

Wake up America trackbacked with: Vote Democrat– Vote Bin Laden




Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: