Anyone with half a brain could see this coming.
A high level U.S. commission’s recommendations for an eventual withdrawal from Iraq and for dialogue with Iran and Syria proves “Islamic resistance” works and America will ultimately be defeated, according to senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND.
The militants, from the largest Palestinian terror groups in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, welcomed the policies outlined by the Iraq Study Group, which they claim recognizes Islam is the “new giant of the world.”
Of course they do. Rush Limbaugh didn’t coin the term, “Iraq Surrender Group.” Terrorists did.
The group is led by former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker.
“The report proves that this is the era of Islam and of jihad,” said Abu Ayman, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin.
The Islamic Jihad terror group is responsible for every suicide bombing in Israel during the past two years.
According to Abu Abdullah, a senior leader of Hamas’ so-called military wing, Baker’s report is a victory for Islam brought about by “Allah and his angels.”
“It is not just a simple victory. It is a great one. The big superpower of the world is defeated by a small group of mujahedeen (fighters). Did you see the mujahedeens’ clothes and weapons in comparison with the huge individual military arsenal and supply that was carrying every American soldier?” exclaimed Abu Abdullah, who is considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas’ Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas’ declared “resistance” department.
Abu Abdullah said following a withdrawal from Iraq, the U.S. will be defeated on its own soil.
“America must understand that with anti-American governments in Latin America and with Islam growing and reinforcing, including in the U.S. itself, the next step would be a total defeat on their (American) land, not a relative one like they are facing in Iraq,” he said.
Exactly what I have been saying for months and liberals call it overreacting. Looks like Baker is now a pawn of Allah’s angels.
For all American liberals, now is a good time to sit down, and see how many of my views line up with terrorists. We can start with these:
- Iraq is a disaster
- We are losing in Iraq
- We cannot do anything to win in Iraq
- Bush is a failure
- We will be attacked again
- I like Kool-Aid
Next, liberals need to ask why my views line up with terrorists and not mainstream, freedom-loving Americans. How did I get out of touch? Start with these:
- I’ve been watching too much CNN
- Al Gore would have done better post 9/11
- John Kerry would have done better in the War on Terror
- Cindy Sheehan is right.
- Other mothers of slain soldiers that don’t politicize their child’s death are wrong.
- War is ALWAYS bad. When we are attacked again, we should help the terrorists so they can wipe us out faster.
Finally, liberals need to change.
“Since when did the United States or any country wage war by publishing its plans or suggested plans for all the world to see? I thought we voted against the international test when we rejected John Kerry? Guess not.”
Before the rest of you surrender monkeys clamor to the comments section and declare “we can’t defeat an enemy that can’t be identified,” “its just a civil war now,” “it’s another Vietnam,” or “the war is a disaster,” let me say this: not one of those platitudes means we should turn tail and run. If we do that, we may as well put up a neon sign in New York City that says “Come on over, terrorists, and attack us! We won’t fight back. We promise.”
We had better take stock of all the implications of surrender. We have seen it before, in 1975 and the years that followed. It looks like we may need to prepare for it again.
Mensa Barbie Welcomes You trackbacked with: Iraqi: ISG (withdrawl) & Ameri-phobia