Let the Porn Through

31 01 2007

Filed under: Pornography, PJI, ACLU

The Sacramento Public Library Authority Board has decided against protecting library users from explicit pornography, a move lawyers at the Pacific Justice Institute had asked them to take, and which may, in fact, violate the library’s own Internet guidelines.

While pornography itself doesn’t “shoot the bullet” for sex crimes, it does “cock the trigger,” and Sacramento officials who supervise their public library system have told porn addicts to go ahead and get loaded.

“The present policy is to require filters on the computers,” Brad Dacus, chief of the PJI, told WND. “However, all that is needed to have access to pornography is for an adult to request that the filters be removed.”

Matthew McReynolds, a staff attorney with the PJI, a non-profit 501(c)(3) legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties, appeared at the library board meeting to encourage restrictions on access to pornography on the publicly-funded computer resources.

“There was an investigation report done recently in Chicago … and the results were extremely disturbing,” he told WND. “They had things like 33 confirmed sex crimes committed at one library branch over a period of three years, and beyond that, just numerous calls to police.”

He said the software must be installed on the computers under the federal Children’s Internet Protection Act, but it does little good if librarians turn the filters off for any reason at all.

“They don’t see it as their place to question what’s going to be accessed,” he said. But the result is that pedophiles and sex offenders are “mingling with young children” in the library facilities.

“To us it is unconscionable. We take so many measures to protect children from sex offenders. Jessica’s Law keeps them from living near schools and churches, yet here is a situation where offenders are mingling with kids in public libraries, getting aroused, and it’s a recipe for disaster.”

And, by a show of hands, who thinks we need to allow Sacremento to wait until a sex offender sneaks off with a child?

But the library’s own Internet policies include the advisory that, “Users may not invade the privacy of others or engage in any activity that is harassing, defamatory or threatening, or receive or display text or graphics which may reasonably be construed as obscene as defined by law.”

But where is the part about, asking permission to turn off the filter releases persons from said policy?

Besides PJI, parents and students from Sacramento had joined in the pleas for restrictions to online pornography at the publicly-funded library.

Appearing in endorsement of the no-limits policy was a law professor and another lawyer claiming affiliation with the ACLU, both of whom argued that the First Amendment protects porn. However, they didn’t explain why the taxpayers must provide it.

Defending a pedofile’s right to access children in front of other children. Shame, ACLU, shame.

Stop The ACLU trackbacked with: Let the Porn Through

Advertisements

Actions

Information

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: