Were it not for humanists’ control of public schools, evolution would have long been replaced with creationism, as it used to be in our schools, or at least be taught along side. Thankfully, most students are still able to get through the gauntlet called public schools and not be totally convinced that creation is a complete myth. Darwin’s theory of evolution, however, is crumbling from within.
The list truly is a “Who’s Who” of prominent scientists in the world today, and now another 100 ranking leaders have added their signatures to a challenge to Darwin’s theory of evolution.
The names include top scientists as MIT, UCLA, Ohio State, University of Washington, University of Pennsylvania, University of Georgia, Harvard, the College of Judea and Samaria, Johns Hopkins, Texas A&M, Duke, University of Peruglia in Italy, the British Museum and others.
The list represents the most educated people in the world from all branches of science with one thing on common – agreement with the following statement: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
It’s shocking that it’s taken such smart people this long to realize that perhaps, there are some holes in Darwin’s theory.
“We know intuitively that Darwinism can accomplish some things but not others,” said Egnor, who has signed the statement. “The question is what is that boundary? Does the information content in living things exceed that boundary? Darwinists have never faced those questions. They’ve never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things.”
And who would? That’s because the answer is NO. If it could answer those questions, we would have a plethora of fossils showing where animals mutated more poorly and were killed in “survival of the fittest.” Instead we have animals and fish showing up and disappearing. This completely contradicts the entire basis for Darwin’s theory – random mutation and natural selection.
The organization assembling the list said “the public has been assured that all known evidence supports Darwinism and that virtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true. Public TV programs, educational policy statements, and science textbooks have asserted that Darwin’s theory of evolution fully explains the complexity of living things.”
However, the documentation actually reveals that in recent decades, “new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics, biology, ‘artificial intelligence’ research, and others have caused scientists to begin questioning Darwinism’s central tenet of natural selection and studying the evidence supporting it in greater detail.”
After decades of not being able to prove it, the support base for the humanist educators is crumbling from underneath them. If a creationist said, “This is the absolute Truth and must be taught because you can’t prove it didn’t happen,” he’d be crucified. But this is essentially the same arguement being made by Darwinacs who are not only unable to prove his theory correct, they are losing ground in the creation debate.
Part II to follow.
A list of the scientists and their credentials who have signed the document is here (pdf).